This is an archive. The forum is not taking new registrations or allowing new discussion, despite what the buttons might suggest.

Le Louvre, Collins Street

<p>The 3 storey 1855 building, Le Louvre, at the intersection of Exhibition Street and Collins Street, helped to define the "Paris End" of Collins Street, a term coined by Le Louvre's founding owner Lillian Wightman. The <a href="">clothing salon</a> has been in business since 1922, but is soon to move. The property has been purchased by the Queensland Investment Corporation who are apparently proposing a, "new retail and office development while preserving the historic facade". [ <a href="">Age article</a> ]</p>
<p>The site, at 74 Collins Street, only <a href=";9673">appears</a> to have heritage status as an archaeological site, protecting what is in the dirt below. The owner of the Le Louvre Salon, Lillian Wightman's daughter Georgina Weir, tried to add 9 storeys of apartments to the building in 2003, and was blocked only because of complaints of overshadowing from the building owner across the street. At the time, The Age <a href="">reported</a>, "<i>If that man stops her from building apartments over her Collins Street fashion boutique, Le Louvre, she will move it to South Yarra. Then she'll lease the building to a fast-food chain. The greasier the better.</i>"</p>
<p>In other <a href="">facadism</a> news, Melbourne University's Old Commerce building, built in the 1930s is to be demolished and the site incorporated into the new architecture building. The facade of the Bank of New South Wales in Collins Street (Joseph Reed 1856), was in 1936 affixed to the Western face of the commerce building, and is to remain. One can only imagine what Joseph Reed would make of it all. [<a href="">Arch school brief</a>].</p>
<p>From a New York Times <a href="">article</a> by Paul Goldberger in 1985: "<i>the city is not a place of make-believe, a place of illusion where little buildings exist to be pinned, like brooches, on the front of bigger structures to which they bear only the most distant of relationships. To turn an older building of distinction into a fancy front door for a new tower is to respect neither the integrity of the new or that of the old, but to render both buildings, in a sense, ridiculous.</i>"</p>
<p>So are we to get a timid new building trying not to be seen as it dwarfs Le Louvre's tiny facade? Perhaps the solution is to move Le Louvre up to Melbourne Uni where it too can be incorporated into the new architecture building, which would become a refuge for lost Collins Street facades, a <a href="">Portmeirion</a> or <a href="">Meiji Mura</a> for Melbourne.</p>
<p>Photo: <a href="">The Lab</a></p>


  • peter_j
    edited November -1
    "On Friday, the state government and the City of Melbourne confirmed that the Collins and Little Collins projects [Naval & Military Club] would be the first important city developments to be examined under a revamped approval process.

    A new advisory committee, comprising members from both levels of government, will examine developments of 25,000 square metres or more, assuming responsibility for what was the job of the Planning Minister alone."
  • landofoz
    edited November -1
    Le Louvre is actually heritage listed as part of the Collins East precinct, though graded rather lowly as the assessment did not fully investigate the building (exterior is an 1855 townhouse largely unaltered except for the facade). So keeping only the facade keeps only one aspect of the significance. And anyway, CBD controls specifically states that 'buildings should be retained in their three dimensional form, not as two dimensional facades as has sometimes occurred.' (clause 22.04). Seems this hard-won bit of the planning scheme has been forgotten !
  • landofoz
    edited November -1
    Georgina departed last year, the shop is now 'Scotch & Soda' with few alterations but none of the elegance, and now a whole new kettle of fish thanks to owners Queensland Investment Corp - an office tower will sit behind and above poor little le louvre. Stylish design, but quite overwhelms the site and area, and the only reason its got a groovy cantilever s so that it can take up the air-space of le louvre.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!