It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
heritage and conservation
Q and A
Architects for Peace
a new hope
edited June 2009
Thanks for the link. Good post.
Scares me to imagine the (R)AIA in full control of the profession here though.
Presumably if it took over from the registration boards membership would become compulsory, along with following their code of conduct, which still includes some ill-defined beauties that have held a few back from joining, and caused a few to leave:
3.3 Standard: Members must not act in any way that brings the profession into disrepute.
4.4 Standard: Members must not maliciously or unfairly criticise or attempt to discredit another
architect or their work.
edited June 2009
no new hope there miles.
points 4 and 5 reveal the conservative mind at work.
protectionist cry baby stuff.
why deregulate the word/title. its a ready made cattle yard.
architects downgraded to draughting staff decades ago.
call yourself something else when necessary?
3.3. test that one out in a court of law. bet rAIA doesn't have the guts to.
believe Lobsters and Limbs tried that one on Godless a few years back internally and got nowhere.
didn't bring discredit maybe? ha ha ha.
@hd you may have missed the ironic star wars allusion sorry. but glad you liked it.
pardon miles. ha.
my anttenna is dulled by the constant irony of giving architects haircuts.
You'll get better odds at the TAB
And better integrity on Tatooine
Even the Ewoks used sticks to beat the Empire/AIA
Sorry - the horsesh*t fumes have me feeling the force
Tats club have tried to regulate the race - but still down to a decent jockey and a hot horse
Back to Tats for a stiff drink - the only way to work away a dumb bet
Powered by Vanilla