This is an archive. The forum is not taking new registrations or allowing new discussion, despite what the buttons might suggest.
boot
Comments
-
the shoes on the royal ulster architectural society's foot now u republican bogans.
________________________________________________________________________________
-
_
_
_ -
wha- ?
-
<p>can't wait to see the polish piece in AP</p>
<p>bringing the red centre to town? - seem to recall Lab's landscapers talking about doing that at Fed square</p> -
(k)not RM williams.
-
<p>been seeing glogs everyhere for the last 10 years - probably going to see them for a lot longer.</p>
<p>AR = Pretty soft launch for the boot.</p>
<p>One SM interview with the main limbs - why didn't the lazy fcuks make more of it?.</p>
<p>HD - thought u said the interiors were supoosed to be good - more shitful than the exterior in the pics I saw.</p>
<p>Expect to see more boot polish.</p> -
only where these hang
-
which r ?
-
rest is -
-
<p>looking forward to visiting the bogs then.</p>
<p>that car characterises arm's general output pretty well- shticky aftermarket custom work.</p>
<p> </p> -
yesterdays ma(e)n?
-
<p>in terms of picking up major commissions they're men for today & tomorrow - aquire a taste for shit sandwiches is my advice!</p>
-
- when it rains it pours for mr. B/ovisrumby
and a de sal shower and SGA deoderiser makes success smell sweet. -
<p>can't see the siamese twins in the building - maybe danny divito & anrie twins?</p>
-
^^^^^^^^^
@ sod.
AR got left behind in the salon by a customer. bored?
I read the "interview."
the choice to interview instead of review was the most interesting reading.
there is a remnant cunning that lingers in the class of 79.
a review of functionalism could only repeat the central points of a 40 year discussion on its irrelevance?
the interviewer/reviewer could not say no - leaving his best option - to say nothing.
the measure of a boot is the wooly sock to wear it. -
<p>sm wasn't exactly carey obrien in dogged pusuit of answers to the more interesting questions he posed - i like the idea of interviews but that was tepid and lacked colour. a review might have been better but sm probably would have pulled his punches.</p>
<p>are the limbs that intimidating? who could do a decent interview?</p>
<p>not and harrison - they did the job with JN.</p> -
interviewer should = a sceptic with no debts.
have just seen the railyards bektonne project.
an innane sampling of melbourne's worst lost buildings?
- the limbs head up a neo functionalist push - where the functional is static.
construction is assigned uncritically to industry = poche.
program is a spread sheet.
architecture the right wing - flapping according to client expectations in the foyer and facade.
interview cemented the boot school as a southern subset of national commercial beaux-arts.
DJ's spawn.
SM met his obligations.
+ (purposefully?) ran out the string on the casting/packaging (porn?) chatter. -
-
<p>they forgot the sustainablity award for its 12 star green energy rating.</p>
<p> </p> -
heaps of points making hoop pine look like recycled cardboard + stays true to shoe box concept.
Howdy, Stranger!